Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Erik Kline's Transport Comment 3 #4515

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4581
Closed

Erik Kline's Transport Comment 3 #4515

LPardue opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4581
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 6, 2021

Erik Kline said:

[ section 9.7 ]

  • "as this would enable..." reads to me like the opposite of what's intended.
    Perhaps: "as failure to do so would enable..."?
@LPardue LPardue added -transport iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 6, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the transport-iesg milestone Jan 6, 2021
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2021
The text was probably backwards, but rather than invert it, remove the
indirect reference to the subject of the claim and be explicit.

Closes #4515.
@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants