Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ben Kaduk's Transport Comment 52 #4664

Closed
LPardue opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4699
Closed

Ben Kaduk's Transport Comment 52 #4664

LPardue opened this issue Jan 7, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4699
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Milestone
transport-iesg

Comments

@LPardue
Copy link
Member

LPardue commented Jan 7, 2021

@kaduk said:

Section 23.1

I think RFC 4086 is typically listed only as an Informative reference.

It is amusing that IPv4 is a normative reference but IPv6 only
informative. (Given how they are referenced, I don't fault this
categorization.)
@LPardue LPardue added -transport iesg An issue raised during IESG review. labels Jan 7, 2021
@LPardue LPardue added this to the transport-iesg milestone Jan 7, 2021
martinthomson added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 8, 2021
@martinthomson
RFC 4086 can be an informative reference
708c357 
Closes #4664.
@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Jan 8, 2021
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Jan 8, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. iesg An issue raised during IESG review.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
transport-iesg
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

RFC 4086 can be an informative reference quicwg/base-drafts
2 participants
@martinthomson @LPardue