Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

UsingTimeLossDetection not defined #534

Closed
larseggert opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

UsingTimeLossDetection not defined #534

larseggert opened this issue May 17, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees
@janaiyengar @ianswett
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.

Comments

@larseggert
Copy link
Member

UsingTimeLossDetection is referred to in Section 3.2.3, but is not defined anywhere.
@larseggert larseggert added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -recovery labels May 17, 2017
ianswett added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 13, 2017
@ianswett
Define kUsingTimeLossDetection
a3e42ed 
Fixes #534
@ianswett ianswett mentioned this issue Nov 13, 2017
Merged
ianswett added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 14, 2017
@ianswett
Define kUsingTimeLossDetection (#922)
ba55881 
* Define kUsingTimeLossDetection

Fixes #534

* Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md

* Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md

* Update draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@janaiyengar janaiyengar

@ianswett ianswett

Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@larseggert @janaiyengar @ianswett