Tweak send stream figure #1054
Tweak send stream figure #1054
Conversation
The use of "Application Open" was confusing. The text is clearer on this point, so simplify the diagram. Closes #1008.
martinthomson
added
editorial
draft-ietf-quic-transport.md
Outdated
| @@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ data to a peer. | |||
|
|
|||
| ~~~ | |||
| o | |||
| | Application Open | |||
| | Open Stream | |||
| | Open Paired Stream (bidirectional) | |||
| v | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The term "Paired Stream" only appears in the figures. Shouldn't this be Open Unidirectional Stream, Open Bidirectional Stream?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good point. Does the latest change work for you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah - sort of - Receive in Send diagram is a bit confusing - but I suppose it means also get ready to receive data.
draft-ietf-quic-transport.md
Outdated
| | Application Open | ||
| | Open Paired Stream (bidirectional) | ||
| | Open Stream | ||
| | Open Bidirectional Receive Stream |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You have the directions flipped (should be Send here and Receive below). Admittedly pedantic, but how about "Open Bidirectional Stream (Sending part)"? Calling it a "Bidirectional Send Stream" sounds silly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No, this is entirely intentional. Opening the receive half of a bidirectional stream causes the send side to open.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@janaiyengar do you have any suggestions for clarifying this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed the current text is confusing. Open Bidirectional Stream might be clearer.
|
Is this better? |
The use of "Application Open" was confusing. The text is clearer on this point, so simplify the diagram.
Closes #1008.