Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Comment about notational conventions #1500

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 6, 2018
Merged

Comment about notational conventions #1500

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions draft-ietf-quic-invariants.md
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD",
document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 {{!RFC2119}} {{!RFC8174}}
when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

This document uses terms and notational conventions from {{QUIC-TRANSPORT}}.


Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't it be the other way around? Given that invariants are less likely to change.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We decided that the transport doc should be standalone (that is, it does not depend on invariants normatively). v1 of the transport might eventually be obsolete, but the terminology will still be there.

# An Extremely Abstract Description of QUIC

Expand Down