Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct application of RFC2119 #1732

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 10, 2018

Conversation

jugglinmike
Copy link
Contributor

The term "MAY" is better suited to describing implementer action (rather
than implementer desire).

The term "MAY" is better suited to describing implementer action (rather
than implementer desire).
@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

The ghost of RFC 6919...

@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit 267ca6e into quicwg:master Sep 10, 2018
@martinthomson martinthomson added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -transport labels Sep 10, 2018
@jugglinmike
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ooo, I haven't seen that one before. Interesting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants