Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move server send limitations #1843

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Move server send limitations #1843

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

martinduke
Copy link
Contributor

This text was in the "Handshake Packet" section but it applies to Handshake and Initial Packets, so I moved it.
Together with PR #1842, this resolves #1836.

This text was in the "Handshake Packet" section but it applies to Handshake and Initial Packets, so I moved it.
Together with PR #1842, this resolves #1836.
Copy link
Contributor

@ianswett ianswett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG, but one comment depending on what you do in the other CL.

the Handshake keys. This limit exists to mitigate amplification attacks.

In order to prevent this limit causing a handshake deadlock, the client SHOULD
always send a packet upon a handshake timeout, as described in
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be "crypto handshake timeout" now?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bump. Also, I'm not sure what the status of this is now that the restructure PR is outstanding?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How exactly is number of bytes measures?

@janaiyengar
Copy link
Contributor

Can you rebase this to #1857? Alternatively, wait a bit until that PR lands and then update this PR.

@martinduke
Copy link
Contributor Author

@janaiyengar I'm happy to either do this when you submit #1857, or you could just incorporate the change (with @ianswett 's nit) directly into that PR and close this one. It's up to you.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Integrated already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Handshake Packet" is Overloaded
5 participants