Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ignore the ack delay in Initial and Handshake packets #2676

Merged

Conversation

marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor

This should have been part of #2646.

Copy link
Member

@martinthomson martinthomson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable to me.

Throughout here, should we be using "peer" or "receiver"?

(The suggestions I make here are not issues with this change, but I'm sure that @ianswett or @janaiyengar will find them a home.)

draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor Author

@martinthomson I applied your suggestions. I think this PR should be marked as editorial.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

The new "MUST" threw me, but it's not really new, is it?

@martinthomson martinthomson added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label May 9, 2019
@marten-seemann
Copy link
Contributor Author

That one was introduced in #2646 already.

Copy link
Contributor

@ianswett ianswett left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for fixing this.

@janaiyengar janaiyengar merged commit bcd6f50 into quicwg:master May 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants