-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section #3031
Reference "Nonces are Noticed" in the header protection analysis section #3031
Conversation
…ion. This paper studies several "nonce hiding" transformations, of which the QUIC header protection algorithm is one. This change replaces the old analysis text with something a bit more crisp.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like the Nonces paper. That validates a lot of what we have previously only theorized.
Co-Authored-By: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Co-Authored-By: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that we're still maybe talking past each other.
…ccordingly. Also, add a note about requirements for future header protection variants.
I'm really happy to see good research on this that confirms our intuitions about one of the most important QUIC-specific constructions. Thanks for doing this Chris. Are you planning to make a similar contribution to DTLS 1.3? |
My pleasure. :-)
Yep! |
This paper studies several "nonce hiding" transformations, of which the QUIC
header protection algorithm is one. This change replaces the old analysis
text with something a bit more crisp.