Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recovery editorial update #3234

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2019
Merged

Recovery editorial update #3234

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 20, 2019

Conversation

ianswett
Copy link
Contributor

Update based on my review of the editor's copy.

@ianswett ianswett added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -recovery labels Nov 15, 2019
draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -549,9 +544,7 @@ expired, the sender SHOULD send ack-eliciting packets from other packet
number spaces with in-flight data, coalescing packets if possible.

When the PTO timer expires, and there is new or previously sent unacknowledged
data, it MUST be sent. Data that was previously sent with Initial encryption
MUST be sent before Handshake data and data previously sent at Handshake
encryption MUST be sent before any ApplicationData data.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are you removing this text?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should have been removed in #3066, but was missed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah, right, of course.

@ianswett ianswett merged commit 16d3ddb into master Nov 20, 2019
@ianswett ianswett deleted the ianswett-recovery-editorial branch November 20, 2019 07:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants