Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ECN editorial #3242

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 18, 2019
Merged

ECN editorial #3242

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions draft-ietf-quic-recovery.md
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -826,9 +826,9 @@ sender. Suppressing reports of ECN-CE markings could cause a sender to
increase their send rate. This increase could result in congestion and loss.

A sender MAY attempt to detect suppression of reports by marking occasional
packets that they send with ECN-CE. If a packet marked with ECN-CE is not
reported as having been marked when the packet is acknowledged, the sender
SHOULD then disable ECN for that path.
packets that they send with ECN-CE. If a packet sent with ECN-CE is not
reported as having been CE marked when the packet is acknowledged, then the
sender SHOULD disable ECN for that path.

Reporting additional ECN-CE markings will cause a sender to reduce their sending
rate, which is similar in effect to advertising reduced connection flow control
Expand Down