Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normative language for PTO #3393

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2020
Merged

Normative language for PTO #3393

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 4, 2020

Conversation

mirjak
Copy link
Contributor

@mirjak mirjak commented Jan 23, 2020

I think this statement should be normative. Not sure if this is a design issue or not.

I think this statement should be normative. Not sure if this is a design issue or not.
Copy link
Member

@martinthomson martinthomson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm comfortable with this being editorial.

@ianswett ianswett added the editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. label Feb 4, 2020
@ianswett ianswett merged commit 19952b9 into quicwg:master Feb 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-recovery editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants