-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 204
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Persistent congestion pseudocode to match text #4010
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c036ffa
Persistent congestion pseudocode to match text
martinthomson 033500d
0 means not set
martinthomson f144481
Fix the AllPacketsLost thing too
martinthomson 2c029b3
Merge branch 'master' into pc-starts-now
martinthomson e1fc8a9
`.append()` is clear than `+=`
martinthomson d02b6a0
Rename and use a direct result
martinthomson 58b1411
Add an implementation tip
martinthomson File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
largest_lost
is the name of the variable we have. This says that the span of length pc_period that ends at the time that the largest lost was sent must start after we first got an RTT sample.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, this is AllPacketsLost is not a fair representation of the algorithm in the latest PR. Only the largest ack-eliciting packet is relevant, and the function needs to ensure that it only considers the first ack-eliciting packet. But I guess we're abstracting over much of that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, we're glossing over a few implementation details with AreAllPacketsLost() below, but I think this is detailed enough.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my comment below. You can change the param here to lost_packets. I would suggest the following:
We could make
AreAllPacketsLostInPeriod()
return the starting point of the persistent congestion period, and use that up here. Meaning call that function first and then check to see if that period starts after first_rtt_sample.