Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New layout format in QPACK #4013

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

New layout format in QPACK #4013

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

MikeBishop
Copy link
Contributor

@MikeBishop MikeBishop commented Aug 18, 2020

Switches QPACK to the layout format from #3573 to match the other QUIC documents. Along the way, it renames the single-letter field names to be more comprehensible (T=Table, H=Huffman-Coded, S=Sign).

For consistency of focus, please discuss editorial / consistency issues here and take "should we make this change" to the issue.

Fixes #3999.

@MikeBishop MikeBishop added editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. -qpack labels Aug 18, 2020
Copy link
Member

@martinthomson martinthomson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a fine conversion, but I'm ambivalent on it.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

Following #3999.

@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the qpack/new_layout branch September 24, 2020 06:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-qpack editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should QPACK use the new layout?
2 participants