Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify why PTOs in idle timeout period #4091

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2020
Merged

Clarify why PTOs in idle timeout period #4091

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2020

Conversation

janaiyengar
Copy link
Contributor

I think this was the intent of the sentence, but I kept not being able to parse it so.

@martinthomson martinthomson added -transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. labels Sep 11, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit 903683b into master Sep 11, 2020
@martinthomson martinthomson deleted the clarify-pto branch September 11, 2020 03:07
This allows for multiple PTOs to expire prior to idle timeout, ensuring the idle
timeout does not expire as a result of a single packet loss.
This allows for multiple PTOs to expire, and therefore multiple probes to be
sent in the event of loss, prior to idle timeout.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probes aren't sent due to a loss, so I think this is also confusing.

ianswett added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2020
An update to #4091
@ianswett ianswett mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-transport editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants