Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Finesse relationship of resumption and 0-RTT #4723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 11, 2021
Merged

Conversation

kaduk
Copy link
Contributor

@kaduk kaduk commented Jan 11, 2021

Resumption is not quite the basis of 0-RTT, since it is also allowed to
pre-provision an external PSK and other parameters and do 0-RTT that
way. This also allows a rewording to avoid implying that 0-RTT would
need to be enabled by configuration, since it is supposed to just be
"on by default".

Fixes: #4477

Resumption is not quite the basis of 0-RTT, since it is also allowed to
pre-provision an external PSK and other parameters and do 0-RTT that
way.  This also allows a rewording to avoid implying that 0-RTT would
need to be enabled by configuration, since it is supposed to just be
"on by default".

Fixes: quicwg#4477
@martinthomson martinthomson added -tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus. labels Jan 11, 2021
@martinthomson martinthomson merged commit cd105a1 into quicwg:master Jan 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-tls editorial An issue that does not affect the design of the protocol; does not require consensus.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Ben Kaduk's TLS Comment 1
3 participants