Script updating archive at 2021-06-15T23:16:20Z. [ci skip]

archive.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "magic": "E!vIA5L86J2I",
-  "timestamp": "2021-04-09T18:06:11.489799+00:00",
+  "timestamp": "2021-06-15T23:16:18.675136+00:00",
   "repo": "quicwg/datagram",
   "labels": [
     {
@@ -1267,9 +1267,9 @@
       "labels": [],
       "body": "This PR changes the TP from `max_datagram_frame_size` to `max_datagram_payload_size`.\r\n\r\nFixes #3.",
       "createdAt": "2020-05-07T19:12:54Z",
-      "updatedAt": "2020-05-08T22:33:26Z",
+      "updatedAt": "2021-06-15T23:15:43Z",
       "baseRepository": "quicwg/datagram",
-      "baseRefName": "master",
+      "baseRefName": "main",
       "baseRefOid": "5fe5d4edd3efe42b74e0bba1489c0feb9fcef9c6",
       "headRepository": "nibanks/datagram",
       "headRefName": "pr/max-datagram-payload-size",
@@ -1606,9 +1606,9 @@
       "labels": [],
       "body": "Clarify meaning of 0 in the datagram transport parameter, based on the discussion at IETF 110. This follows one of the suggestions to have 0 mean no datagrams, and > 0 mean support for datagrams. This should be a non-breaking change with existing implementations.\r\n\r\nCloses #3 ",
       "createdAt": "2021-03-31T18:31:58Z",
-      "updatedAt": "2021-03-31T20:58:29Z",
+      "updatedAt": "2021-06-15T23:15:43Z",
       "baseRepository": "quicwg/datagram",
-      "baseRefName": "master",
+      "baseRefName": "main",
       "baseRefOid": "6dec1591e44a54fc1ed6f1c6f43c7196b30d6acc",
       "headRepository": "quicwg/datagram",
       "headRefName": "tfpauly-patch-1",
@@ -1688,9 +1688,9 @@
       "labels": [],
       "body": "Closes #6",
       "createdAt": "2021-03-31T18:55:19Z",
-      "updatedAt": "2021-03-31T21:13:55Z",
+      "updatedAt": "2021-06-15T23:15:43Z",
       "baseRepository": "quicwg/datagram",
-      "baseRefName": "master",
+      "baseRefName": "main",
       "baseRefOid": "6dec1591e44a54fc1ed6f1c6f43c7196b30d6acc",
       "headRepository": "quicwg/datagram",
       "headRefName": "tfpauly-patch-2",
@@ -1826,6 +1826,26 @@
               "updatedAt": "2021-03-31T21:13:55Z"
             }
           ]
+        },
+        {
+          "id": "MDE3OlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0UmV2aWV3NjU3MzA5NjQ2",
+          "commit": {
+            "abbreviatedOid": "76d135a"
+          },
+          "author": "LPardue",
+          "authorAssociation": "MEMBER",
+          "state": "COMMENTED",
+          "body": "",
+          "createdAt": "2021-05-11T23:30:58Z",
+          "updatedAt": "2021-05-11T23:30:58Z",
+          "comments": [
+            {
+              "originalPosition": 35,
+              "body": "Given some of the churn in H3 DGRAM, how about we extract this third paragraph into another issue/PR that we can sit on while we land the other changes?",
+              "createdAt": "2021-05-11T23:30:58Z",
+              "updatedAt": "2021-05-11T23:30:58Z"
+            }
+          ]
         }
       ]
     }