Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Can be acknowledged? #24

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #28
Closed

Can be acknowledged? #24

martinthomson opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #28

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Member

QUIC datagrams, while unreliable, can support acknowledgements, allowing applications to be aware of whether a datagram was successfully received.
-- https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-quic-datagram-03.html#section-2-2.3

Isn't it the case that they are acknowledged?

(This one is just a nit, the next issue will be more serious.)
martinthomson added a commit to martinthomson/datagram that referenced this issue Jul 19, 2021
@martinthomson
Tweak motivation
20a607c 
Drop the text on acknowledgments.

Closes quicwg#26.
Closes quicwg#24.

Then modify the congestion control thing to make the benefit clearer.  A
unified congestion controller can be more efficient.
@martinthomson martinthomson mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Tweak motivation martinthomson/datagram
1 participant
@martinthomson