New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Editorial suggestions from Benjamin Kaduk's IESG Evaluation #76
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for this, in particular finding the outdated TP name! I like changes 2 and 3 out of 3 but would prefer to skip the first one.
draft-ietf-quic-datagram.md
Outdated
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ QUIC, such as for a Virtual Private Network (VPN). Internet-layer tunneling | |||
protocols generally require a reliable and authenticated handshake, followed by | |||
unreliable secure transmission of IP packets. This can, for example, require a | |||
TLS connection for the control data, and DTLS for tunneling IP packets. A single | |||
QUIC connection could support both parts with the use of unreliable datagrams. | |||
QUIC connection could support both parts when unreliable datagrams are available. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I personally prefer the original text here, sorry.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The motivation for any change here is that the original text sounds like the (reliable) control data is being supported by the unreliable datagrams, which seems unlikely to be the expected use.
Other options include "by augmenting reliable streams with unreliable datagrams", "could extend from the former to the latter by using unreliable datagrams", etc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about with the use of unreliable datagrams in addition to reliable streams
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sold
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
No description provided.