Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 7 - ack strategy #473

Closed
mirjak opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #503
Closed

IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 7 - ack strategy #473

mirjak opened this issue May 13, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #503

Comments

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor

mirjak commented May 13, 2022

Section 7 talks about acknowledgment strategy, but it is not actually giving any examples of what the application can do. Since it is kind of a transport layer property and not an application layer property, it is unclear how an application [developer] can replace the "TCP like ack every other packet" functionality. Are there QUIC options to consider that do this? If so, why not mention those here?

@mirjak mirjak changed the title IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 7 IESG review Paul Wouters: Section 7 - ack strategy Jun 1, 2022
@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirjak commented Jun 1, 2022

I guess there is draft https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-quic-optimizing-ack-in-wlan/ but not sure we want to add a reference...?

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirjak commented Jun 1, 2022

I guess we should at least add a reference to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency/ however that is currently expired :-(

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirjak commented Jun 9, 2022

I've sent a reply to Paul by email and waiting for a response now.

@gorryfair
Copy link
Contributor

Unsure why we would specifically reference this rather than other work: draft-li-quic-optimizing-ack-in-wlan/, I expect the correct thing is to reference a WG RFC, and section 2.5 of RFC9065 is one way. Citing the WG ack frequency draft might additionally be useful.

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirjak commented Jul 5, 2022

For the record, this is what I replied by mail:

"[MK] This is a whole research area of its own... however, I create an issue to see if people think adding some reference might be useful. There is a wg draft in QUIC for an extension to negotiate the ack frequency and there is another individual draft about strategies for WLANs. Still, this is also not really QUIC specific. Similar proposals also exists for TCP. The difference is that with TCP the network can also do ACK thinning which is not possible with QUIC anymore."

@mirjak
Copy link
Contributor Author

mirjak commented Jul 5, 2022

@gorry but RFC9065 section 2.5 doesn't talk about acks at all...

I still propose to add a reference to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-ack-frequency/ as this is a wg doc at least.

mirjak added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 5, 2022
@mirjak mirjak self-assigned this Jul 5, 2022
@mirjak mirjak added the has PR label Jul 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants