Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Note that ephemeral ports aren't usually reflectors #487

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jul 5, 2022
Merged

Note that ephemeral ports aren't usually reflectors #487

merged 2 commits into from Jul 5, 2022

Conversation

britram
Copy link
Contributor

@britram britram commented May 18, 2022

fixes #475

mirjak
mirjak reviewed May 31, 2022
View reviewed changes
draft-ietf-quic-applicability.md Outdated

that following the general guidance for client implementations given in
{{?RFC6335}}, to use ephemeral ports in the range 49152–65535, has the
effect of avoiding these ports.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine to add this advice, however, this came up because in practice this advise is not always followed...

However, why did you remove the existing text rather than just adding a pointer to RFC6335?

@britram britram merged commit 9fddb83 into main Jul 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mirjak mirjak mirjak left review comments

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
-applicability
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

IESG Review Paul Wouters: Section 8.1 - source port blocking
2 participants
@britram @mirjak