Move into quic-rs organization and possibly rename to quic?

[newpavlov]

@dyxushuai and @cssivision own quic crate and have created quic-rs org. I think it would be nice if you three will work together. What do you think?

[djc]

It looks like they have so far not done any actual work; rather, they have claimed a crate name on crates.io without writing any code, and it also looks like they copied text from my README. As such, I don't see what I would gain from working with them (except for the crate name, which I don't care much for).

[dyxushuai]

@newpavlov Sorry, I was busy with my work in these days, and we will commence to finish the remaining work from June. Thanks a lot

[newpavlov]

@dyxushuai
djc has indicated his interest in gaining access to the quic-rs org. What do you say? As a potential consumer I personally would prefer to have a single high-quality implementation under quic crate name, rather than 2-3 competing projects of varying quality.

[Ralith]

With quinn successfully participating in draft-17 interop, and the quic crate still empty, perhaps it's time to revisit this?

[Ralith]

Closing as the owners of the quic name are unresponsive and at this point we're pretty committed to our name anyway.