Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use charm from github #2

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 20, 2017
Merged

use charm from github #2

merged 6 commits into from
Apr 20, 2017

Conversation

junghans
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@rspavel rspavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We may need to revert if this is abandoned in favor of the internal gerrit but I see no issue with this for now

@jbakosi
Copy link
Member

jbakosi commented Apr 19, 2017

I don't see their usual tags in the github repo. We have historically tracked and upgraded using tags. Do you propose to track the master now? If so, that's not a good idea, IMO.

@junghans
Copy link
Member Author

Good point, submodules depend on hashed, but tags would be nice to have for updating.

@stwhite91: Could you mirror the tags, too?

@stwhite91
Copy link

The tags for recent releases and the 6.8.0 betas have been added now.

@junghans
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks!

@jbakosi jbakosi merged commit a82da2e into master Apr 20, 2017
@jbakosi jbakosi deleted the charm branch April 20, 2017 00:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants