Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Functions for generating quantum operators #147

Closed
19 tasks done
ytdHuang opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #169
Closed
19 tasks done

Functions for generating quantum operators #147

ytdHuang opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #169
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers work-in-progress Work in progress

Comments

@ytdHuang
Copy link
Member

ytdHuang commented May 29, 2024

There are still some functions (compare to qutip) unsupported yet.

  • Re-organize source code for Qobj #150
    • Move the existing functions and the following ones into an independent file qobj/operators.jl
  • Introduce commutator, fcreate, and fdestroy #156
    • commutator
    • fdestroy
    • fcreate
  • Constructing general spin-j operators #158
    • jmat
    • spin_Jx
    • spin_Jy
    • spin_Jz
    • spin_Jm
    • spin_Jp
    • spin_J_set
  • Functions for generating quantum operators #169
    • displace
    • num
    • position
    • momentum
    • phase
    • squeeze
    • tunneling
    • qft
  • Decide not to implement at this moment
    • identity: this will cause conflict with Base.identity
    • qdiags: this can be implement easily using Qobj together with LinearAlgebra.diagm or SparseArrays.spdiagm in Julia
    • squeezing: I'm not sure whether the current definition for generalized squeeze operator in QuTiP is common in the literature. So I decide not to implement it for now.
    • charge: I didn't find a common definition of this, maybe this can be implemented if someone needs it in the future.
@ytdHuang ytdHuang added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers work-in-progress Work in progress labels May 29, 2024
@ytdHuang ytdHuang self-assigned this May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers work-in-progress Work in progress
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant