SWAP gate for (non-) reversed circuit #177
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
SWAP needs to be treated differently for circuits with reversed and non-reversed states order.
hodgestar
approved these changes
Nov 9, 2022
|
It would be nice to have some tests indeed. In the test actions of |
BoxiLi
added a commit
to BoxiLi/qutip-qip
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 11, 2022
SWAP needs to be treated differently for circuits with reversed and non-reversed states order.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
SWAP needs to be treated differently for circuits with reversed and non-reversed states order.
The fix in #170 was not complete. The reason for using
\qwx[%d]without the minus sign is actually because inqutip-qipthe order of states is reversed.