-
I'm doing a simulation of a dissipative chain. Based on the documentation ,
It seems to me that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
The issue is probably because method 2 requires you to take the square root of the rate gamma, see just below equation 3 in the documentation and the example code there. The logic is that the ''collapse operator'' in that approach is actually c = sqrt(gamma) * a, which will give the lindblad dissipator equivalent to method 1 when the construction of the dissipator is made internally in mesolve(), i.e., c \rho c^{\dagger}+... = gamma a \rho a^{\dagger}.... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
The issue is probably because method 2 requires you to take the square root of the rate gamma, see just below equation 3 in the documentation and the example code there.
The logic is that the ''collapse operator'' in that approach is actually c = sqrt(gamma) * a, which will give the lindblad dissipator equivalent to method 1 when the construction of the dissipator is made internally in mesolve(), i.e., c \rho c^{\dagger}+... = gamma a \rho a^{\dagger}....