New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-interactive version of update_packages? #1260

Closed
pkq opened this Issue Jul 13, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@pkq
Contributor

pkq commented Jul 13, 2016

Currently, calling update_packages() without providing a list of packages to update prompts the user for confirmation, meaning the function cannot be used non-interactively. Does it make sense to add an argument to allow this prompt to be overridden (e.g., update_packages(override = TRUE) )?

@hadley

This comment has been minimized.

Member

hadley commented Aug 2, 2017

This will be dealt with in remotes, particularly as we rethink how installation and updates should happen.

@hadley hadley closed this Aug 2, 2017

@lock

This comment has been minimized.

lock bot commented Sep 18, 2018

This old issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with reprex) and link to this issue. https://reprex.tidyverse.org/

@lock lock bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 18, 2018

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.