-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add infer verbs? #10
Comments
I think this makes a lot of sense. I’m not exactly sure how others would use the verbs individually instead of in the {infer} pipeline though too, but I’m likely overlooking some use cases. |
I don't think new functions should live here; this is specifically for base functions (or functions used by many existing packages) that should be generic. I think these functions would be a better fit for modelgenerics. |
I was assuming this repo and |
@ismayc we're probably going to send this to CRAN this week. Do you have any issues if I add those verbs? I don't see much downside. |
Nope. That works for us. |
@topepo Looks good to me. We should probably switch to |
I'll change and do a PR. Thanks! |
generate
,calculate
,hypothesize
,specify
, andvisualize
are all pretty generic.I think that these are all simple functions that take tibbles so it might require overloading the classes to get a specific method what
infer
wants to do.@andrewpbray and @ismayc... any thoughts on this? This would enable others to use those verbs for their specific needs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: