-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Queue argument check can produce a confusing error message #1887
Comments
lukebakken
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 17, 2019
lukebakken
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2019
michaelklishin
added a commit
to ruby-amqp/bunny
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2019
See streadway/amqp#373 and rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server#1887 for background.
michaelklishin
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 18, 2019
See #1887 for context. When an exclusive queue is redeclared with the exclusive property set to `false`, the code considers it to be an ownership check. This is a leaked implementation detail that's been around for years, so changing it might do more harm than good. What we can do is provide a bit more information about when the check might fail in the message.
kjnilsson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2019
kjnilsson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2019
See #1887 for context. When an exclusive queue is redeclared with the exclusive property set to `false`, the code considers it to be an ownership check. This is a leaked implementation detail that's been around for years, so changing it might do more harm than good. What we can do is provide a bit more information about when the check might fail in the message.
kjnilsson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 22, 2019
kjnilsson
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 22, 2019
See #1887 for context. When an exclusive queue is redeclared with the exclusive property set to `false`, the code considers it to be an ownership check. This is a leaked implementation detail that's been around for years, so changing it might do more harm than good. What we can do is provide a bit more information about when the check might fail in the message.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
See streadway/amqp#373
Run the following to reproduce: repro.go.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: