Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve stale bot setting [ci skip] #254

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2020

Conversation

junaruga
Copy link
Contributor

I would like to improve the stale bot.
This fixes #253 .

  • Change not to close the issue ticket.
    It makes users unhappy, even when we have less human power to fix.
  • Change the stale label from wontfix to stale.
    We would prepare more constructive naming label and message.

I referred following document and example about the message.

See https://github.com/probot/stale

* Change not to close the issue ticket.
  It makes users unhappy, even when we have less human power to fix.
* Change the stale label from wontfix to stale.
  We would prepare more constructive naming label and message.
@perlun
Copy link
Contributor

perlun commented Jan 16, 2020

Looks good, thanks

@junaruga
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review!
The commit comment includes [ci skip], but Travis is waiting status in the PR. It's weird.

@junaruga junaruga merged commit 8a3ef19 into rack:master Jan 16, 2020
@junaruga junaruga deleted the feature/improve-stale-bot branch January 16, 2020 14:33
@junaruga
Copy link
Contributor Author

The commit comment includes [ci skip], but Travis is waiting status in the PR. It's weird.

Anyway, I merged it now.

alex-damian-negru pushed a commit to alex-damian-negru/rack-test that referenced this pull request Apr 5, 2021
See https://github.com/probot/stale

* Change not to close the issue ticket.
  It makes users unhappy, even when we have less human power to fix.
* Change the stale label from wontfix to stale.
  We would prepare more constructive naming label and message.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Closing ticket automatically could be improved
2 participants