Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

An exception was raised in attempting to build racket 8.12 #4932

Open
Antigen-1 opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

An exception was raised in attempting to build racket 8.12 #4932

Antigen-1 opened this issue Feb 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
build Build failures, Makefiles, Zuo scripts, autoconf, building instructions, etc. release-management Topics related to releases: regression, build failures for RCs, blocking issues, etc.

Comments

@Antigen-1
Copy link
Contributor

Antigen-1 commented Feb 11, 2024

What version of Racket are you using?
I'd removed the original racket installation.

What program did you run?
Unix Source + built packages

./configure --prefix=$HOME/racket --enable-scheme=scheme CC=clang
make
make install

What should have happened?
There shouldn't have been exceptions or warnings.

If you got an error message, please include it here.

cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/bin/ta6le/scheme -B cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/petite.boot -B cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/scheme.boot --script cs/c/same-boot.ss cs/c/ChezScheme/boot/ta6le/petite.boot cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/petite.boot
Exception in $fasl-file-equal?: code comparison failed while comparing cs/c/ChezScheme/boot/ta6le/petite.boot and cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/petite.boot at #[#{code striprur0zx3-18} 18 65 0 #[#{string striprur0zx3-4} 4 39 "real->flonum"] #[#{small-integer striprur0zx3-14} 14 4] #[#{atom striprur0zx3-19} 19 12 6] #[#{atom striprur0zx3-19} 19 12 38] #vu8(76 137 197 64 246 197 7 117 52 77 141 97 250 73 131 193 16 77 57 78 88 114 23 72 193 253 3 242 76 15 42 253 242 69 15 17 124 36 6 76 137 229 65 255 101 0 73 188 255 255 255 255 0 0 0 0 65 255 212 235 218 72 137 233 72 131 225 7 72 131 249 7 117 14 72 139 77 1 72 131 225 31 72 131 249 6 116 20 72 137 233 72 131 225 7 72 131 249 7 117 37 72 131 125 1 22 117 30 73 137 232 73 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 139 124 36 5 72 199 197 1 0 0 0 65 255 100 36 13 72 137 233 72 131 225 7 72 131 249 2 117 4 65 255 101 0 73 137 248 72 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 72 137 238 73 188 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 139 124 36 5 72 199 197 3 0 0 0 65 255 100 36 13) 4 #(#[#{reloc striprur0zx3-20} 20 6 112 65 #[#{atom striprur0zx3-19} 19 15 176]] #[#{reloc striprur0zx3-20} 20 0 66 0 #[#{string striprur0zx3-4} 4 2 "inexact"]] #[#{reloc striprur0zx3-20} 20 0 47 0 #[#{string striprur0zx3-4} 4 9 "~s is not a real number"]] #[#{reloc striprur0zx3-20} 20 0 13 0 #[#{string striprur0zx3-4} 4 2 "$oops"]])] within fasl entry 71
cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/bin/ta6le/scheme -B cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/petite.boot -B cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/scheme.boot --script cs/c/same-boot.ss cs/c/ChezScheme/boot/ta6le/scheme.boot cs/c/ChezScheme/ta6le/boot/ta6le/scheme.boot
Warning in write: cycle detected; proceeding with (print-graph #t)

If this is the behaviour expected or documented, make should have detected this and returned immediately.

Please include any other relevant details

uname -a
Linux fedora 6.7.3-200.fc39.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Feb  1 03:29:52 UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux
scheme --version
9.9.9-pre-release.16

Besides, the racket that has been problematically built works well. I can install and build all packages I need.

@shhyou shhyou added build Build failures, Makefiles, Zuo scripts, autoconf, building instructions, etc. release-management Topics related to releases: regression, build failures for RCs, blocking issues, etc. labels Feb 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build Build failures, Makefiles, Zuo scripts, autoconf, building instructions, etc. release-management Topics related to releases: regression, build failures for RCs, blocking issues, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants