New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meta: Path to a MVP #153

Closed
heikoheiko opened this Issue Oct 11, 2016 · 11 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
7 participants
@heikoheiko
Contributor

heikoheiko commented Oct 11, 2016

Revise the milestones so that they plan for the quickest route to a minimal viable product. I.e. usability, key handling, channel opening, UI might be more important than updating the transport layer or routing algorithm.

@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

Intended audience: Developers considering to use Raiden in their DApp

Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

Intended audience: Developers considering to use Raiden in their DApp

@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

Accounts: For now assume we can read the keystore file (or a copy of it) of the local Ethereum node. #180

Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

Accounts: For now assume we can read the keystore file (or a copy of it) of the local Ethereum node. #180

@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

What is the maximum acceptable setup effort for a user/user application? Should it be boxed or an installable library?

  • minimal effort onboarding: "automate all the stuff that can be automated"
  • have a "boxed" installer for a usable "service daemon", generalized for at least common GNU/Llinux distributions, OS X

#179

Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

What is the maximum acceptable setup effort for a user/user application? Should it be boxed or an installable library?

  • minimal effort onboarding: "automate all the stuff that can be automated"
  • have a "boxed" installer for a usable "service daemon", generalized for at least common GNU/Llinux distributions, OS X

#179

@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

Q: Will there be a end-user interface?

Yes, have a minimal JS/HTML based UI as an example. Try to cooperate with volunteers.

Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

Q: Will there be a end-user interface?

Yes, have a minimal JS/HTML based UI as an example. Try to cooperate with volunteers.

@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

How will routing be solved in the MVP? Global view, or different strategy?

  • new routing strategy is out of scope for MVP (since scaling issues are unknown at this point)
Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

How will routing be solved in the MVP? Global view, or different strategy?

  • new routing strategy is out of scope for MVP (since scaling issues are unknown at this point)
@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

Q: How do we handle going offline? Support for 3rd party challenging? Persistence?
A:

  • Add persistence
  • Support state resync
  • Add 3rd party challenging
Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

Q: How do we handle going offline? Support for 3rd party challenging? Persistence?
A:

  • Add persistence
  • Support state resync
  • Add 3rd party challenging
@konradkonrad

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@konradkonrad

konradkonrad Oct 12, 2016

Collaborator

Q: Which spam protection model should be employed in the MVP? Fees or throttling?
A: Throttling

Collaborator

konradkonrad commented Oct 12, 2016

Q: Which spam protection model should be employed in the MVP? Fees or throttling?
A: Throttling

@heikoheiko

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@heikoheiko

heikoheiko Oct 12, 2016

Contributor

.

Contributor

heikoheiko commented Oct 12, 2016

.

@heikoheiko heikoheiko modified the milestone: MVP Oct 19, 2016

@hackaugusto hackaugusto removed their assignment Nov 23, 2016

@LefterisJP LefterisJP added the Epic label Dec 20, 2016

@czepluch czepluch removed the Epic label Jan 12, 2017

@philreader

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@philreader

philreader Jul 12, 2017

In the last dev update, you mentioned Raiden MVP's expected release date is around March 2017. I am wondering what's the latest on the progress?

philreader commented Jul 12, 2017

In the last dev update, you mentioned Raiden MVP's expected release date is around March 2017. I am wondering what's the latest on the progress?

@scuzzleb

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@scuzzleb

scuzzleb Jan 25, 2018

can you please set a date when you are going to release mvp. It is nessesery for your community. Appretiate us

scuzzleb commented Jan 25, 2018

can you please set a date when you are going to release mvp. It is nessesery for your community. Appretiate us

@LefterisJP LefterisJP removed this from the MVP milestone Apr 6, 2018

@heikoheiko heikoheiko removed their assignment Apr 12, 2018

@LefterisJP

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@LefterisJP

LefterisJP Aug 31, 2018

Collaborator

There is nothing actionable in this issue. Closing.

Collaborator

LefterisJP commented Aug 31, 2018

There is nothing actionable in this issue. Closing.

@LefterisJP LefterisJP closed this Aug 31, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment