add a Table#name accessor like TableDefinition#name #17580
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ccutrer
force-pushed
the
change_table_name
branch
from
0955a0f
to
f0f1ae1
Compare
|
If you want this to be public API, should add a spec for |
|
@egilburg done |
ccutrer
force-pushed
the
change_table_name
branch
from
f0f1ae1
to
76e7305
Compare
senny
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 11, 2014
add a Table#name accessor like TableDefinition#name
|
@ccutrer thank you 💛 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
we have a gem that dynamically creates tables (based on date), but passes the
Tableobject on to the client for further manipulating the schema. it's useful for that client to be able to access the dynamic name. I thought it could looking at the docs forTableDefinition, until I realized thatchange_tablecreates aTable, not aTableDefinition