Test to ensure content_tag works when fixing #17661 #18054
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
After c2fe093, which was reverted yesterday, there will likely be future PRs to address rails#17661. The test `actionview/test/template/capture_helper_test.rb #test_capture_returns_nil_if_the_returned_value_is_not_a_string` should have errored with c2fe093, but it was rewritten in the PR to not raise. My guess is that it may have seemed irrelevant to the content_tag tests or already covered by them. This test provides additional protection by being in the content_tag test suite to explicitly raise a red flag in future cases. It foregoes some redundancy for safety — at least until rails#17661 is closed.
rafaelfranca
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 16, 2014
Test to ensure content_tag works when fixing #17661
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After c2fe093, which was reverted yesterday, there will likely be
future PRs to address #17661.
The test `actionview/test/template/capture_helper_test.rb
test_capture_returns_nil_if_the_returned_value_is_not_a_string` should
have errored with c2fe093, but it was rewritten in the PR to not raise.
My guess is that it may have seemed irrelevant to the content_tag tests
or already covered by them.
This test provides additional protection by being in the content_tag
test suite to explicitly raise a red flag in future cases.