[ci skip] Update 4.2 Release notes with more assert_select information. #19502
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
kaspth
force-pushed
the
assert-select-failure-output
branch
from
252ae14
to
9c8910f
Compare
Adds documentation for substitutions and why Regexp substitions look different when assertion fails.
kaspth
force-pushed
the
assert-select-failure-output
branch
from
9c8910f
to
c8ca20f
Compare
rafaelfranca
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2015
[ci skip] Update 4.2 Release notes with more assert_select information.
rafaelfranca
added a commit
to kaspth/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2015
[ci skip] Update 4.2 Release notes with more assert_select information.
|
Backported to |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds documentation for substitutions and why Regexp substitions look different
when assertion fails.
As promised a while ago here: #19098 (comment)
(@rafaelfranca said I could handle the 4.2 backport)