Improve wording in getting started guide #31953
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rails team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @eileencodes (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. This repository is being automatically checked for code quality issues using Code Climate. You can see results for this analysis in the PR status below. Newly introduced issues should be fixed before a Pull Request is considered ready to review. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
guides/source/getting_started.md
Outdated
| This option tells Rails that we want this form to be submitted | ||
| via the `PATCH` HTTP method which is the HTTP method you're expected to use to | ||
| **update** resources according to the REST protocol. | ||
| Passing the `@article` object to the method will automatically set the URL for |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I'd prefer to keep "the article object" here -- it's the class that affects the URL, but mentioning the variable name here seems to risk implying it's relevant. What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good call. After re-reading the rest of the guide, just the plain "article object" text makes sense here. The specific syntax of model: @article is described below anyway.
I'll revert it and push up a new commit.
jameslovejoy
force-pushed
the
improve-wording-getting-started
branch
from
a5f7464
to
b62eed1
Compare
Summary