[ci skip] Improve ActiveSupport::MessageVerifier docs #44332
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
public-rant
pushed a commit
to opensource-rant/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2022
* [ci skip] Refer to Rails.application.message_verifier in MessageVerifier docs * [ci skip] Clarify authentication example * [ci skip] Use meaningful example data for message verifier docs * [ci skip] Link to Rails.application.message_verifier docs * [ci skip] Clarify order of message signing and verification * [ci skip] Re-order sections in order of expected use * [ci skip] Recommend using a purpose to reduce risks * [ci skip] More consistent parentheses
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
My main goal was to make it obvious in the MessageVerifier docs that Rails has a way to manage different verifier instances via
Rails.application.message_verifier.While I was in the area I also took the opportunity to improve readability and clarify the rest of the MessageVerifier docs by:
cc @dhh