-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix ActiveStorage::Blob inverse association: #50800
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
4 tasks
- This is a fix needed to unblock rails#50284, because Active Storage relies on a Active Record bug. The problem is best understood with a small snippet: ``` blob = ActiveStorage::Blob.new ActiveStorage::Attachment.new(blob: blob) ActiveStorage::Attachment.new(blob: blob) # Currently: p blob.attachments #=> #<ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy []> # Once the Active Record bug is fixed: p blob.attachments #=> #<ActiveRecord::Associations::CollectionProxy [#<ActiveStorage::Attachment id: nil, name: nil, record_type: nil, record_id: nil, blob_id: nil, created_at: nil>, #<ActiveStorage::Attachment id: nil, name: nil, record_type: nil, record_id: nil, blob_id: nil, created_at: nil>]> # Trying to save the blob would result in trying to create 2 attachments which # fails because of unique constrainsts. ``` ### Code path The real code path that does what the snippet above does is located here: https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/9c3ffab47c3bf59320ba08e9dafdb0275cf91a5a/activestorage/lib/active_storage/attached/many.rb#L52 It's basically doing this: ``` user.images.attach "photo1.png" # Initialize a Blob record and an Attachment user.images.attach "photo2.png" # Get the Blob from above, create another Attachment # Initialize a new Blob record and an new Attachment # rinse and repeat every time `attach` is called ``` Basically each time we call `attach`, we grab the previous blobs that were attached (and that already have an Attachment record), and ### Solution - Explicitly set the `inverse_of`, so that it behaves as if rails#50284 is shipped - Don't build a new attachment for blob already having one. ### Tests I didn't add tests, the test suite is already well covered, adding the `inverse_of` without any changes breaks the test suite already. You can try by running for instance the `activestorage/test/models/attached/many_test.rb`.
27d99d1
to
82d4ad5
Compare
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
casperisfine
pushed a commit
to Shopify/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
fractaledmind
pushed a commit
to fractaledmind/rails
that referenced
this pull request
May 13, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
xjunior
pushed a commit
to xjunior/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
HeyNonster
pushed a commit
to HeyNonster/rails
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 12, 2024
Ref: rails#50284 While having the inverse association configured it generally positive as it avoid some extra queries etc, infering it may break legecy code, as evidenced by how it broke `ActiveStorage::Blob` in rails#50800 As such we can't just enable this behavior immediately, we need to provide and upgrade path for users.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation / Background
This is a fix needed to unblock #50284, because Active Storage relies on a Active Record bug.
Detail
The problem is best understood with a small snippet:
Additional information
The real code path that does what the snippet above does is located here:
rails/activestorage/lib/active_storage/attached/many.rb
Line 52 in 9c3ffab
It's basically doing this:
Solution
inverse_of
, so that it behaves as if Infer:inverse_of
forhas_many ..., through:
#50284 is shippedTests
I didn't add tests, the test suite is already well covered, adding the
inverse_of
without any changes breaks the test suite already. You can try by running
for instance the
activestorage/test/models/attached/many_test.rb
.Checklist
Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:
[Fix #issue-number]