use consistent explicit module inclusion #5484
Merged
+6
−6
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
aid ease of understanding and readability for tests
|
A little more consistency is always good, thanks! |
fxn
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2012
use consistent explicit module inclusion
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
aid ease of understanding and readability for tests
I'm new to rails internals and going through the tests to get a good idea of how things work. Sometimes important modules that bring in lots of functionality are referenced by their absolute name and sometimes they aren't. I think they should be referenced using their full name.