Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Conditional Event #29

Open
rakhimov opened this issue Jul 13, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Conditional Event #29

rakhimov opened this issue Jul 13, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
dynamic analysis enhancement fault tree analysis
Projects
Status

Comments

@rakhimov
Copy link
Owner

Implement conditioning event that can be used with Priority And and Inhibit gates.
@rakhimov rakhimov added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Jul 13, 2014
@rakhimov rakhimov changed the title Conditioning Event Conditional Event Jul 25, 2014
@rakhimov
Copy link
Owner Author

This event is implemented to be used with only inhibit gate.

rakhimov added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2018
@rakhimov
Remove INHIBIT & CONDITIONAL flavor format
24c62ca 
The current approach is not optimal due to being a special case
with the abuse of the MEF attributes mechanism.
INHIBIT gate must be implemented properly with dynamic analysis.
The changes are backward compatible
since these flavors had no effect on the analysis.

Issue #28
Issue #29
rakhimov added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 31, 2018
@rakhimov
GUI: Remove CONDITIONAL event visualization
7e5cc38 
Since there's not yet INHIBIT gate,
CONDITIONAL event is phony and confusing.

Issue #29
Issue #132
@rakhimov rakhimov reopened this Jan 31, 2018
@rakhimov rakhimov removed this from the v0.2.0 milestone Jan 31, 2018
@rakhimov rakhimov added this to To do in Status Jul 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dynamic analysis enhancement fault tree analysis
Projects
Status
  
Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rakhimov