Use ProtocolFamily to represent socket protocol families #3164
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This also removes PF_MAX, which ended up making it harder to verify if a socket family is actually a supported socket family rather than easier, and adds PF_UNSPEC, which was missing.
|
It'd make more sense to include this with a set of changes I'll be making soon rather than making it its own thing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This also removes PF_MAX, which ended up making it harder to verify if a
socket family is actually a supported socket family rather than easier,
and adds PF_UNSPEC, which was missing.
Pulling this since this could be a breaking change if I screwed anything up.
Passes
make test,make spectest.