Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting for selecting linux-terminal windows by WM_NAME (window title) #164

Open
wants to merge 11 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cdbrendel
Copy link

As I proposed in #163, this pull request adds an optional setting window_name that alters the behavior of the linux-terminal prog setting. If set, xdotool will attempt to find a window with a WM_NAME that matches the window_name pattern. If unsuccessful, it will fall back to the default behavior (i.e., just send code to the latest window whose WM_CLASS matches the value of linux_terminal). This pull request also contains a proposed subsection in the readme describing the use-case of window_name and giving an example configuration.

The anticipated user of this setting is someone who simultaneously uses multiple windows that contain multiple REPLs--for example, a researcher or analyst working on a project with a mixed codebase whose workflow consists of running Python code before running some R code to analyze the results. This pull should be particularly useful for users who configure their workspace[s] with saved layouts (in which assigning immutable names to windows is very common). Prior to this pull request, the workaround that I personally used to emulate this behavior was to run different REPLs in different terminal emulators (radian in Terminator, ipython in kitty, etc.).

This is obviously my first pull request for SendCode, so sorry for any silly mistakes or assumptions!

@cdbrendel cdbrendel changed the title Wm name selector Setting for selecting linux-terminal windows by WM_NAME (window title) Feb 2, 2022
code_sender/sender.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Owner

@randy3k randy3k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks useful. Just some minor detail.

@cdbrendel
Copy link
Author

Thanks for reviewing so quickly @randy3k! I agree with all your feedback and I've implemented your suggestions in the latest commits.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants