Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A new logging method for auxillary module is needed. #17852

Open
Ryuuuuu opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

A new logging method for auxillary module is needed. #17852

Ryuuuuu opened this issue Apr 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
suggestion-feature New feature suggestions

Comments

@Ryuuuuu
Copy link
Contributor

Ryuuuuu commented Apr 4, 2023

Summary

Currently, the format of auxiliary module logging varies from module to module, and when a module is successful, it mostly outputs logging via print_good.

However, since the module for detecting vulnerabilities and the module for searching simple information exist together in the auxiliary module, it is difficult to determine whether or not the target is vulnerable at a glance

It would be good to divide the logging method to determine at a glance whether the target is vulnerable.

It will not be easy because there are many existing modules, but it would be nice to have such a function.

Basic example

It would be good to divide the logging method to determine at a glance whether the target is vulnerable.

like print_vuln and print_info

Motivation

The use of auxiliary modules is likely to be much easier.

@Ryuuuuu Ryuuuuu added the suggestion-feature New feature suggestions label Apr 4, 2023
@adfoster-r7
Copy link
Contributor

the format of auxiliary module logging varies from module to module,

Adding to this; Auxiliary scanner modules that run against multiple hosts in parallel can often be very quiet by default, even when run against one host - which can also be confusing to end users.

@saurabhmj11

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
suggestion-feature New feature suggestions
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants