Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not use x86_64 GDS binaries for aarch64 #590

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

gigony
Copy link
Contributor

@gigony gigony commented Jul 27, 2023

Although there are no cuFile / GDS binaries for SSBA ( aarch64 ) currently, it still requires 'cufile.h' file to create a libcufile_stub library that loads libcufile dynamically.

This patch still download GDS package but do not copy GDS libraries if the architecture is aarch64.

Address #586

Signed-off-by: Gigon Bae <gbae@nvidia.com>
@gigony gigony added improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change labels Jul 27, 2023
@gigony gigony added this to the v23.08.00 milestone Jul 27, 2023
@gigony gigony requested review from jakirkham and grlee77 July 27, 2023 00:58
@gigony gigony self-assigned this Jul 27, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@grlee77 grlee77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good to me, thanks Gigon!

run
@@ -234,6 +234,30 @@ retry() {
return 0
}

get_arch() {
local platform="${1:-$(uname -p)}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

uname -m may be more portable?
I think it will mostly be x86_64 or aarch64, but it looks like there are other arm-related possibilities listed here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/45125516/possible-values-for-uname-m

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Thanks Gigon! 🙏

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member

/merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 0ad9d8e into rapidsai:branch-23.08 Jul 27, 2023
24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
improvement Improves an existing functionality non-breaking Introduces a non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants