Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Java bindings version to 0.18-SNAPSHOT [skip ci] #6949

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2020

Conversation

jlowe
Copy link
Member

@jlowe jlowe commented Dec 9, 2020

Updating the Java bindings package version to match the libcudf version.

@jlowe jlowe added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team Java Affects Java cuDF API. 4 - Needs cuDF (Java) Reviewer non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Dec 9, 2020
@jlowe jlowe requested a review from a team as a code owner December 9, 2020 02:21
@jlowe jlowe self-assigned this Dec 9, 2020
@jlowe jlowe added this to PR-WIP in v0.18 Release via automation Dec 9, 2020
@jlowe jlowe added feature request New feature or request improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function and removed feature request New feature or request labels Dec 9, 2020
v0.18 Release automation moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Reviewer approved Dec 9, 2020
@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 44eeb70 into rapidsai:branch-0.18 Dec 9, 2020
v0.18 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Dec 9, 2020
@jlowe jlowe deleted the update-jni-version branch September 10, 2021 15:43
@vyasr vyasr added 4 - Needs Review Waiting for reviewer to review or respond and removed 4 - Needs cuDF (Java) Reviewer labels Feb 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team 4 - Needs Review Waiting for reviewer to review or respond improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function Java Affects Java cuDF API. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
v0.18 Release
  
Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants