Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] HDBSCAN #3821

Merged
merged 209 commits into from
Jun 3, 2021
Merged

[REVIEW] HDBSCAN #3821

merged 209 commits into from
Jun 3, 2021

Conversation

cjnolet
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet commented May 3, 2021

We had originally tried to ease the review process by separating the Python and CUDA/C++ layer code for HDBSCAN (see #3773), and for the most part we have been separating the commits, however this made it very cumbersome to keep cherry-picking commits backwards so we abandoned #3773 and continued working on this PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@tfeher tfeher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the updates, the PR looks good to me!

@cjnolet cjnolet requested a review from a team as a code owner May 29, 2021 00:14
@github-actions github-actions bot added the conda conda issue label May 29, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dantegd dantegd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks good from me too, just requested adding an item to the follow ups issue (if it’s not already there). Once hdbscan python package is in integration we should be good to merge.

dtype=dtype,
memptr=mem_ptr)).to_output('numpy')

def _construct_condensed_tree_attribute(self, ptr, dtype="int32"):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you add the item of trying this as a property, I think it can be a follow up nice to have but not indispensable (and need to think about the getattr…)

Copy link
Member

@dantegd dantegd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Totally missed the conda change, which goes hand in hand with adding hdbscan to the rapids-build meta package

conda/recipes/cuml/meta.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented May 29, 2021

Can you add the item of trying this as a property, I think it can be a follow up nice to have but not indispensable (and need to think about the getattr…)

@dantegd, absolutely I'd like to use a lazy-loaded property here. I initially tried this as a lazy-populated property (using @property) but I kept getting an error in __hasattr__ of the base class and I couldn't figure out a good way to make it work. It is very possible that I was doing something wrong, though, and I would prefer to use that pattern if we can get it to work.

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Jun 1, 2021

Added item to our follow-on task to revisit the property / lazy-loaded members for plotting objects: #3879 (comment)

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the conda conda issue label Jun 1, 2021
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Jun 1, 2021

PR to add hdbscan package to rapids-build-env for tests: rapidsai/integration#288

@cjnolet cjnolet added 5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge and removed 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team labels Jun 1, 2021
@ajschmidt8
Copy link
Member

Removing ops-codeowners from the required reviews since it doesn't seem there are any file changes that we're responsible for. Feel free to add us back if necessary.

@ajschmidt8 ajschmidt8 removed the request for review from a team June 1, 2021 20:00
v21.06 Release automation moved this from PR-Needs review to PR-Reviewer approved Jun 2, 2021
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jun 2, 2021

rerun tests

1 similar comment
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jun 2, 2021

rerun tests

@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Jun 2, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Jun 2, 2021

Going to try again in hopes the changes to the integration repo just weren't picked up in time.

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Jun 2, 2021

rerun tests

1 similar comment
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented Jun 2, 2021

rerun tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.06@92484fb). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.06    #3821   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   85.13%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      230           
  Lines                   ?    18138           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    15441           
  Misses                  ?     2697           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.80% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 77.49% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 92484fb...1519478. Read the comment docs.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 870c7ee into rapidsai:branch-21.06 Jun 3, 2021
v21.06 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Jun 3, 2021
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
We had originally tried to ease the review process by separating the Python and CUDA/C++ layer code for HDBSCAN (see rapidsai#3773), and for the most part we have been separating the commits, however this made it very cumbersome to keep cherry-picking commits backwards so we abandoned rapidsai#3773 and continued working on this PR.

Authors:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)
  - Divye Gala (https://github.com/divyegala)

Approvers:
  - Tamas Bela Feher (https://github.com/tfeher)
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#3821
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Ready to Merge Testing and reviews complete, ready to merge CMake CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue feature request New feature or request New Algorithm For tracking new algorithms that will be added to our existing collection non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants