Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] AgglomerativeClustering support single cluster and ignore only zero distances from self-loops #3824

Merged

Conversation

cjnolet
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet commented May 4, 2021

Closes #3801
Closes #3802

Corresponding RAFT PR: rapidsai/raft#217

@cjnolet cjnolet added bug Something isn't working non-breaking Non-breaking change labels May 4, 2021
@cjnolet cjnolet requested review from a team as code owners May 4, 2021 14:15
@cjnolet cjnolet added this to PR-WIP in v21.06 Release via automation May 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added CMake CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue labels May 4, 2021
Copy link
Member

@dantegd dantegd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes look good pending merging of the PR in RAFT and updating the commit hash once that's merged

v21.06 Release automation moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Reviewer approved May 5, 2021
@dantegd dantegd added the 5 - Merge After Dependencies Depends on another PR: do not merge out of order label May 5, 2021
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented May 12, 2021

rerun tests

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the CMake label May 19, 2021
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented May 20, 2021

argh the CI test failure was unfortunate timing that cause mismatched cuDF and libcudf:

cudf-21.06.00a210519       |cuda_11.0_py37_g1f9f0610a7_341       111.2 MB  rapidsai-nightly
libcudf-21.06.00a210519    |cuda11.0_g32c1bac3cf_342       186.9 MB  rapidsai-nightly

@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented May 20, 2021

rerun tests

@cjnolet
Copy link
Member Author

cjnolet commented May 20, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.06@4d06991). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.06    #3824   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   85.41%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      227           
  Lines                   ?    17313           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    14788           
  Misses                  ?     2525           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 48.92% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 77.35% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4d06991...99f8ae1. Read the comment docs.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit 05124c4 into rapidsai:branch-21.06 May 20, 2021
v21.06 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done May 20, 2021
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…istances from self-loops (rapidsai#3824)

Closes rapidsai#3801 
Closes rapidsai#3802 

Corresponding RAFT PR: rapidsai/raft#217

Authors:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#3824
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5 - Merge After Dependencies Depends on another PR: do not merge out of order bug Something isn't working CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
3 participants