Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use clang-tools on x86 only #3969

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 14, 2021
Merged

Conversation

jakirkham
Copy link
Member

Since there is a specific version of clang-tools we need and it may be difficult to migrate that to other architectures, restrict installing clang-tools to x86. After all this is only needed for checking code style, which can be done just on x86 without loss of generality.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the conda conda issue label Jun 9, 2021
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

cc @dantegd @teju85 @JohnZed (in case any of you have thoughts 🙂)

@cjnolet cjnolet added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Jun 9, 2021
@cjnolet cjnolet added this to PR-WIP in v21.08 Release via automation Jun 9, 2021
v21.08 Release automation moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Reviewer approved Jun 9, 2021
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, pending style fix (looks like copyright).

@jakirkham jakirkham marked this pull request as ready for review June 9, 2021 18:48
@jakirkham jakirkham requested review from a team as code owners June 9, 2021 18:48
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jakirkham jakirkham requested a review from jjacobelli June 9, 2021 19:14
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Jun 11, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

rerun tests

3 similar comments
@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

rerun tests

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

rerun tests

@jakirkham
Copy link
Member Author

rerun tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.08@74aaf05). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.08    #3969   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   85.24%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      230           
  Lines                   ?    18211           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    15524           
  Misses                  ?     2687           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.95% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 77.64% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 74aaf05...b67f601. Read the comment docs.

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit adb1d66 into rapidsai:branch-21.08 Jun 14, 2021
v21.08 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Jun 14, 2021
@ajschmidt8
Copy link
Member

I manually overrode the failing status check in order to merge this PR since the only failure was on the a100 tests and a100 testing shouldn't be enabled.

@jakirkham jakirkham deleted the use_clang_x86 branch June 14, 2021 15:09
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Since there is a specific version of `clang-tools` we need and it may be difficult to migrate that to other architectures, restrict installing `clang-tools` to x86. After all this is only needed for checking code style, which can be done just on x86 without loss of generality.

Authors:
  - https://github.com/jakirkham

Approvers:
  - Jordan Jacobelli (https://github.com/Ethyling)
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: rapidsai#3969
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
conda conda issue CUDA/C++ improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants