Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] Fixing UMAP reproducibility pytest failures in 11.4 by using random init for now #4152

Conversation

cjnolet
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet commented Aug 10, 2021

This is side-stepping the spectral clustering bug for now. The spectral clustering using to be reproducible (and I'm fairly confident that it used to be returning the proper eigenpairs as well) but through various updates to the CTK, it seems to have gotten broken somewhere, potentially even in multiple places.

@cjnolet cjnolet added bug Something isn't working 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Aug 10, 2021
@cjnolet cjnolet requested review from a team as code owners August 10, 2021 16:50
@cjnolet cjnolet added this to PR-WIP in v21.10 Release via automation Aug 10, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue labels Aug 10, 2021
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.10@5f5fc49). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.10    #4152   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   85.96%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      232           
  Lines                   ?    18500           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    15904           
  Misses                  ?     2596           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.76% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 78.56% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5f5fc49...f931958. Read the comment docs.

@trivialfis
Copy link
Member

Sorry for my slow progress.

v21.10 Release automation moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Reviewer approved Aug 11, 2021
@dantegd
Copy link
Member

dantegd commented Aug 12, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit fb2f9d4 into rapidsai:branch-21.10 Aug 12, 2021
v21.10 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Aug 12, 2021
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
…nit for now (rapidsai#4152)

This is side-stepping the spectral clustering bug for now. The spectral clustering using to be reproducible (and I'm fairly confident that it used to be returning the proper eigenpairs as well) but through various updates to the CTK, it seems to have gotten broken somewhere, potentially even in multiple places.

Authors:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

Approvers:
  - Dante Gama Dessavre (https://github.com/dantegd)

URL: rapidsai#4152
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team bug Something isn't working CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants