Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[REVIEW] Exposing KL divergence in TSNE #4208

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 28, 2021

Conversation

viclafargue
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@viclafargue viclafargue requested review from a team as code owners September 14, 2021 15:37
@github-actions github-actions bot added CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue labels Sep 14, 2021
@caryr35 caryr35 added this to PR-WIP in v21.10 Release via automation Sep 15, 2021
@caryr35 caryr35 moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Needs review in v21.10 Release Sep 15, 2021
@viclafargue viclafargue added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Sep 28, 2021
@caryr35 caryr35 added this to PR-WIP in v21.12 Release via automation Oct 4, 2021
@caryr35 caryr35 moved this from PR-WIP to PR-Needs review in v21.12 Release Oct 4, 2021
@caryr35 caryr35 removed this from PR-Needs review in v21.10 Release Oct 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the CMake label Oct 5, 2021
@viclafargue viclafargue requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2021 17:18
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the CMake label Oct 8, 2021
@viclafargue viclafargue changed the base branch from branch-21.10 to branch-21.12 October 8, 2021 17:19
@viclafargue viclafargue changed the title [WIP] Exposing KL divergence in TSNE [REVIEW] Exposing KL divergence in TSNE Oct 11, 2021
Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good. As usual, mostly minor things.

cpp/src/tsne/barnes_hut_kernels.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/exact_tsne.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/include/cuml/manifold/tsne.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/cannylab/bh.cu Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/distances.cuh Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/fft_kernels.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/tsne.cu Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/src/tsne/utils.cuh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/test/sg/tsne_test.cu Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/test/sg/tsne_test.cu Show resolved Hide resolved
@viclafargue viclafargue requested a review from a team as a code owner October 25, 2021 15:20
@github-actions github-actions bot added the gpuCI gpuCI issue label Oct 25, 2021
Copy link
Member

@ajschmidt8 ajschmidt8 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approving ops-codeowner file changes

Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, Victor, I thought I had submitted the re-review on this and just realized I still had comments pending. 2 very trivial things and I think this initial version is ready to go.

cpp/include/cuml/manifold/tsne.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
cpp/include/cuml/manifold/tsne.h Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@viclafargue
Copy link
Contributor Author

rerun tests

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.12@51c41c4). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.12    #4208   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   86.04%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      231           
  Lines                   ?    18714           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    16103           
  Misses                  ?     2611           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.00% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 78.74% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 51c41c4...41dc683. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@cjnolet cjnolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

v21.12 Release automation moved this from PR-Needs review to PR-Reviewer approved Oct 28, 2021
@cjnolet
Copy link
Member

cjnolet commented Oct 28, 2021

@gpucibot merge

@rapids-bot rapids-bot bot merged commit a7d0300 into rapidsai:branch-21.12 Oct 28, 2021
v21.12 Release automation moved this from PR-Reviewer approved to Done Oct 28, 2021
divyegala pushed a commit to divyegala/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2021
zbjornson added a commit to zbjornson/cuml that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2021
Undefined behavior introduced in rapidsai#4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers.
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 15, 2021
Undefined behavior introduced in #4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers.

Authors:
  - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: #4363
zbjornson added a commit to zbjornson/cuml that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2021
P_sum is equal to n. See rapidsai#2622 where I made this change once before. rapidsai#4208 changed it back while consolidating code.
rapids-bot bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2021
P_sum is equal to n. See #2622 where I made this change once before. #4208 changed it back while consolidating code.

Authors:
  - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: #4425
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
Undefined behavior introduced in rapidsai#4208. These parameters are restrict-qualified, but the callers pass pointers with the same address and the arrays are modified through both pointers.

Authors:
  - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: rapidsai#4363
vimarsh6739 pushed a commit to vimarsh6739/cuml that referenced this pull request Oct 9, 2023
P_sum is equal to n. See rapidsai#2622 where I made this change once before. rapidsai#4208 changed it back while consolidating code.

Authors:
  - Zach Bjornson (https://github.com/zbjornson)

Approvers:
  - Corey J. Nolet (https://github.com/cjnolet)

URL: rapidsai#4425
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CUDA/C++ Cython / Python Cython or Python issue gpuCI gpuCI issue improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
No open projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants